翻訳と辞書 |
Fardon v Attorney-General (Qld) : ウィキペディア英語版 | Fardon v Attorney-General (Qld)
''Fardon v Attorney-General (Qld)'' (2004) 223 CLR 575 was a case decided in the High Court of Australia regarding the separation of powers in Australia. ==Background== Queensland passed legislation regarding sex offenders, allowing the Supreme Court of Queensland to continually detain a particular class of prisoner to protect the community. In the event that a prisoner was about to be released, the Attorney-General could request continuing detention. The Act required that the prisoner be serving a sentence of serious sexual offence (involving violence or against children). Fardon was such a prisoner who was convicted in 1989 of offences of rape, sodomy and assault, and was due to be released in June 2003. The Attorney-General applied for an order on 17 June 2003, which was granted on 27 June, but not finalised until November of that year. Fardon was hence detained after his prison sentence had expired. Fardon argued the legislation conferred non-judicial power to the Supreme Court (per ''Kable'').
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Fardon v Attorney-General (Qld)」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|